missturdle:

What I want to know is why when Scientists and Academics hold discussions that break into the nuances of whatever it is they’re studying, whatever theories and practices they have, it’s called “Peer Review” and disagreements, debates, facts, and rhetoric are generally seen as contributing

— but when marginalized/oppressed people do the same things it’s just “armchair activism” and only “talking”.

(Source: turdlewexler)

28 Oct 2012 / Reblogged from bad-dominicana with 167 notes

  1. huntswoman reblogged this from turdlewexler
  2. wordstomeawhisper reblogged this from strugglingtobeheard
  3. vampirefinch reblogged this from bad-dominicana
  4. ashlynnbast reblogged this from sehnsuchttraum
  5. resmc reblogged this from katelucia
  6. thisistheurlformyblogdoyoulikeit reblogged this from misandristscum
  7. cyborgcap reblogged this from sakuratsukikage
  8. sakuratsukikage reblogged this from sehnsuchttraum
  9. chantersboard reblogged this from sehnsuchttraum
  10. sehnsuchttraum reblogged this from misandristscum
  11. misandristscum reblogged this from bad-dominicana
  12. indigorama reblogged this from dreamsaboutshapeshifting
  13. slacker-assassin reblogged this from bad-dominicana
  14. dreamsaboutshapeshifting reblogged this from searchingforknowledge
  15. sihmah reblogged this from gayandroids
  16. the-nomadic-writer reblogged this from lady-brown
  17. bronwenoir reblogged this from strugglingtobeheard
  18. anastronomicalsmile reblogged this from dakotacityukuleleorchestra
  19. kayellegetlo reblogged this from bad-dominicana
  20. leidis reblogged this from bad-dominicana
  21. native-detroiter reblogged this from strugglingtobeheard